P3
Legal and Ethical
LEGAL
Issue
|
Solved or
justified?
|
Child
Protection
|
9.4.1
We should
apply the principles of the BBC Child Protection Policy in our dealings with
children and young people under 18.
Their welfare is our paramount consideration. This means their interests and safety must
take priority over any editorial requirement.
Rick and
Morty has a 15 age rating and touches on some adult topics and uses vulgar
language which is not appropriate on the bbc. I had to be careful for which
language I used as the guests and listeners could be under 18.
|
Right of
reply
|
Right of
Reply
6.4.25
When our
output makes allegations of wrongdoing, iniquity or incompetence or lays out
a strong and damaging critique of an individual or institution the
presumption is that those criticised should be given a "right of
reply", that is, given a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations.
We must
ensure we have a record of any request for a response including dates, times,
the name of the person approached and the key elements of the exchange. We should normally describe the allegations
in sufficient detail to enable an informed response, and set a fair and
appropriate deadline by which to respond.
The
creators of the show (Dan Harmon and Justin Roiland) are allowed to come onto
my show and respond to comments I have made about it.
|
Avoid
misleading audiences
|
3.4.11
We must not knowingly and
materially mislead our audiences with our content. We may need to
clarify the nature of some content by labeling (for example, verbally, in
text or with visual or audio cues) to avoid being misleading.
Some
listeners may think that they are going to listen to an episode instead of my
podcast as I use the Rick and Morty theme song at the start of my podcast
|
Gathering
Material
·
|
3.4.1
We
should try to witness events and gather information first hand. Where
this is not possible, we should talk to first hand sources and, where
necessary, corroborate their evidence. We should be reluctant to rely
on a single source. If we do rely on a single source, a named
on-the-record source is always preferable.
We
should record our research interviews with sources wherever possible.
In circumstances where recording might inhibit the source, full notes should
be made, preferably at the time or, if not, as soon as possible afterwards.
I do not credit my sound clips in the show however they are
all from the show Rick and Morty.
|
ETHICAL
Issue
|
Solved or
justified?
|
Intimidation
and Humiliation.
|
I Intimidation and Humiliation
5.4.32
BBC content must respect human
dignity. Intimidation, humiliation,
intrusion, aggression and derogatory remarks are all aspects of human behaviour
that may be discussed or included in BBC output. Some content can be cruel but unduly
intimidatory, humiliating, intrusive, aggressive or derogatory remarks aimed
at real people (as opposed to fictional characters or historic figures) must
not be celebrated for the purposes of entertainment. Care should be taken that such comments and
the tone in which they are delivered are proportionate to their target.
I followed the guidelines however some
may think that one of my interviews came across as humiliating and
intimidating.
|
Personal
View Content
|
4.4.29
The BBC
has a tradition of allowing a wide range of individuals, groups or
organisations to offer a personal view or opinion, express a belief, or
advance a contentious argument in its output.
This can range from the outright expression of highly partial views by
a campaigner, to the opinion of a specialist or professional including an
academic or scientist, to views expressed through contributions from our
audiences. All of these can add to the
public understanding and debate, especially when they allow our audience to
hear fresh and original perspectives on familiar issues.
On my
show I only have positive views on rick and morty which may mislead people
into thinking the show is perfect.
|
Accuracy
issues
|
13.4.3
We
should be aware that material we plan to re-use or reversion may have become
out of date, inaccurate or inappropriate for other reasons. Where
necessary to achieve due accuracy, it should be labelled and/or dated.
Care
must be taken over the release of content containing information which new
research has revealed to be inaccurate, such as medical information or advice
which, if followed, may put people's health at risk. Where appropriate,
the use of context and content information (including, for example, archive
branding and labelling) should be considered.
I do not
date my podcast on the show meaning some may find its content inaccurate and may
think that the show is inaccurate.
|



Comments
Post a Comment